Soft-tissue grafting procedures are performed for a variety of clinical indications to increase the soft-tissue volume under pontics or around dental implants or natural tooth, i.e. mainly for esthetic purposes, based on the mucosal biotype and patient expectations.1-4 Thin mucosal biotypes are more prone to functional or esthetic dysfunctions as compared with thick biotypes. Soft-tissue augmentations contribute to more than 40% of the final soft-tissue volume at implant sites3, result in superior esthetics, more stable soft-tissue dimensions and contribute to more stable bone levels at implant sites.1-5
Autogenous connective tissue grafts (CTG) are used to augment soft-tissue volume and according to the literature are considered to be the gold standard.1-6 However, these procedures are time-consuming and painful for the patients.
The new volume-stable collagen matrix, Geistlich Fibro-Gide®, is the alternative to autogenous CTG and avoids the disadvantages of harvesting grafts and thus, post-operative pain and potential post-operative complications may be reduced.6-9 Clinically, soft-tissue volume augmentation with Geistlich Fibro-Gide® is comparable with connective tissue grafts.1-6
Clinical case: Increased soft-tissue thickness around a single implant with Geistlich Fibro-Gide®.
- Studer SP. et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Apr;83(4):402-11.
- Kinsel RP & Capoferri D. et al. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2008 May;20(4):231-6; quiz 237.
- Schneider D. et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):28-37.
- De Bruyckere T. et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Sep;42(9):876-82.
- Zeltner M. et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Apr;44(4):446-453.
- Thoma DS. et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Oct; 43(10): 874–85.
- Sanz M. et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Oct; 36(10): 868–76.
- Del Pizzo M. et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Sep; 29(9): 848–54.
- Soileau KM. & Brannon RB. J Periodontol. 2006 Jul; 77(7): 1267–73.